Difference between revisions of "Talk:Free and open-source software"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{discussion page note}} | ||
| + | |||
Why contribute section? - Commercial and individual | Why contribute section? - Commercial and individual | ||
Revision as of 22:24, 11 February 2007
| This 'discussion page' is currently used to hold notes for the development of this website (however it can still be used for discussion) |
|---|
Why contribute section? - Commercial and individual
Panel on why people contribute - perhaps shared with collaborative design section
The amazing complexity of some these projects
Wikimedia commons
Books
Creative commons etc.
Paragraph largely made redundant by the free riders section:
The fact that thousands of other people are able to make use of the software having put in no effort themselves and haven't paid any money simply isn't an issue - after all it effectively costs nothing to replicate the software and the open-source developers are only too happy that it is proving useful to a wider audience. It is truly maximizing it's utility.
Other software to list:
- Open source radio: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6241923.stm
- http://www.jokosher.org/
- koffice
- Scribus
- Wiki and content management software
- POVRay
Mention fsf focus on freedom, OSInitiative focus on commons-based peer production as more efficient development model (than proprietary methods)
